You have to admit that
when you are researching for anything in the science and technology fields, it
is hard not to come by anything that isn’t dry and filled with facts. Even when
I was researching for blogs, all the ones I came across were filled with
scientific facts and research, and really didn’t have any personal voice in
them. Although the writer was making an argument, I really could not tell
through their writing how they really felt about a topic. After a few tries I
ran across the human cloning foundation blogspot, that to my surprise contained
many blog posts that had plenty of voice. Specifically the ones written by Ma
Tingnu. You would think most activist to be against human cloning and that they
would be the ones with the most voice, but Ma is quite the contrary. She is an
activist for human cloning research. Rather than going the really scientific
route, she is able to tie in certain subjects like movies and well known people
to make her points which makes it easier for the readers who really have never
heard of human cloning and its ethical dilemmas to understand better. The real
key to her being personable and easy to read is the voice that comes through
her writing.
One of her strong posts
is titled “Human Cloning and the Bible.” In this posts she talks about if
whether or not clones would believe in the bible. Her argument is that like any
other individual, clones will make their own decision and choose whether or not
they believe in the bible. She is able to have a strong voice with this
argument by creating an array of moods in her short post. In the beginning she
starts with a matter of fact and disbelief approach. She manages this by using
strong diction with phrases such as, “utter lack of knowledge” and “Godless,
soul-less beings.” Through these phrases you can really here her anger and
passion on the subject, which she also shows towards the end of her post where
she uses an exclamation point to emphasize her argument. Although, she shows a
strong argumentive voice in various places, she is also able to show a more
upbeat and persuasive voice. To make a connection with the reader she brings in
widely known figures such as Stephen Hawkings which provides a common ground
for the reader and helps her persuasion. At the end of the post she brings out
her more upbeat and joyful voice by using words and phrases such as, “silly
questions” and “Heck.” Such techniques can be seen throughout her other posts.
Here is the link to the post “Human cloning and the Bible”: http://humancloningfoundation.blogspot.com/2011/02/human-cloning-and-bible.html
Another example of her
strong voice can be seen in the post titled, “Roaring Ahead.” Although she
starts off by quoting a scientist and then going to talk about medical and
research breakthroughs, you are able to see her usual strong voice at the end
were she wraps up her argument and post. Again, she shows her passion and
persuasion through strong and elaborate diction. An example of this can be seen
in the sentence, “Hope is no longer a flickering light, but a steady beam
shining ever brighter.” Her analogy, although it sounds a bit over the top,
really ties in to the post nicely that it does not seem out of place and really
conveys her thoughts on the subject of cloning and stem cell research. She then
goes on to finish her post with, “Let it roar ahead, indeed!” This shows her
excitement on the subject which is emphasized by her choice to tie in the title
of her post and usage of an exclamation point. As you can tell her voice is
pretty consistent throughout her post, which make them a fun read.
Here is the link to the post “Roaring Ahead”: http://humancloningfoundation.blogspot.com/2011/01/roaring-ahead.html
So, if you are interested in reading posts full of
passion and argument feel free to check Ma Tingnu out!
Great post! You provided a lot of great examples that directly label the voice that you hear. I like how you give a variety of different phrases that evoke contrasting emotions. Your analysis of punctuation is interesting as well! I also think it is unique how you intertwine the title into your analysis as well! I didn't think to do that with my post and I wish I had. You seem like you have a good understanding of voice especially with such a scientific topic. As you mentioned, it is difficult to find voice with that type of genre. Great analysis!
ReplyDeleteI thought you introduced the piece very honestly which was endearing. I feel like it's a hit or miss with these scientific blogs, either you hit jackpot and find someone who passionately writes about what they believe or it's all straight up facts. I think you found a blogger with a strong voice, I just wish you discussed more of what she believes and why and backed it up with more quotes. I couldn't get a complete sense of her arguments. Overall, great job!
ReplyDelete