Thursday, October 30, 2014

A Profile on the Blogger of The Genetic Engineering Debate

Sometimes it is a bit hard to find a blogger that has unique edge to a topic you have researching for a while now. Well lucky me I was able to find one.

Ramsey Affifi is the blogger for The Genetic Engineering Debate and he is in the education business. He is interested in “the relationship between pure and applied science, between knowledge and technology, between reflection and action, sustainability and changeability, between science and spirituality” (Affifi, profile). All his interest are what give his blog about Genetics a very interesting edge. He is able to capture his readers not through his angle but through the information he provides.

He is not completely against genetically modifying organisms (GMOs), but he does believe that everyone should be informed of the risks and the technical information that we are not told by researchers and companies that perform such experiments. He believes that these companies and researchers should teach us about the risks and not just the benefits. His most interesting argument revolves in him believing that the activist against GMOs should not just focus on the ethical portion of the issue but should inform themselves of the scientific risks and how that can affect humanity.

Although, Affifi does not blog very often only once a month to once every few months, his posts are very detailed, researched and lengthy that the reader does not feel like they are missing out between posts. Also, in his blogroll he provides other blogs that have to do exactly what he is talking about, so if you feel like you need more information or a different perspective, he provides that for his readers. Overall he seems to be very dedicated to this topic which even shows in his blogroll and the length of time he has been blogging about it. Affifi, has been blogging since May 2007. He has had only 472 views to his page, but by the comments his readers leave on his posts we can tell that they appreciate the information. He does not receive many comments, but from the ones he does receive he gets positive feedback and suggestions on how to strengthen and back up his argument. Affifi does not respond to all the comments he receives, but the ones he does respond to, he makes sure to take his time and really address what the reader has to say. If he does not agree with what the comment stated, he backs up his argument with evidence and tells the reader he does understand where they are coming from but still holds to his opinion. His dedication and connectivity with the reader also shows in the length of his responses. Rather than having a couple sentences for a response, most of the time he responds with full on paragraphs.

Another interesting part of his blog is that Raffifi, has split his blog between 5 different subjects. The way he managed to do this is by creating 5 different tabs with categories that all have to do with his overall blog of The Genetic Engineering Debate.
The 5 tabs are:
-          Science of GMOs
-          The Education Wars
-          Taking Action
-          GMOs and Children
-          Food Security

Each tab contains posts pertaining to each category but they always tie back to his dominant subject which is the education of the public on GMOs. The separation between these categories gives an interesting insight into his voice and way of thinking. On some posts, like the ones under Science of GMOs, he takes on a more matter of fact, straight to the point, research paper voice. He provides the facts and his arguments and backs them up with research he sites at the end of each of his posts. This might sound boring, but he manages to make it engaging and relatable to the general public, that you would not mind reading it. On the other hand, certain posts like some under the category Taking Action, are a little less formal and shows his more animated side.  He still informs you, but at the same time he keeps you engaged with his rantier manner of writing.

So you can get a better idea of what I am talking about check out the two summaries I have provided from different posts Raffifi has made.

Unpredictable Genes
                In this posts rather than taking the nature vs nurture angle that many activists take, he focuses on the scientific proof. He goes into depth in the sciences behind genes and chromosomes and how they function. He also relates it back to human behavior, but still keeping the scientific evidence to back it up. It is a very interesting read. Even though, the post reads like a research paper, he makes the material interesting enough that you don’t mind reading it.

The Powerful Potential of Anti – GMO Cyber Citizens!
                This posts although still deals with research and data, it is lively and full of voice. It talks about a survey done to people through the company Smucker’s Facebook Page. His writing is less matter of fact and more story like which is different from his usual research posts. He uses analogies to compare the results of the survey to how bees function, which was very clever. Furthermore, he is still realistic and engaging even though he has taken a different approach to his writing. Definitely a fun and quick read!


Raffifi is definitely a blogger worth checking out. So if he sounds interesting or you just want to learn more about genetics this is the blog for you!
Here is the link to check his blog out:

Thursday, October 16, 2014

A Reflection on “Never Let Me Go”

For those who haven’t watched the movie here is a quick overview.

Never Let Me Go movie poster

The film tells the story of three clones, Kathy H, Ruth C and Tommy D. During their childhood the clones reside in a type of boarding school that is specifically dedicated for children like them. The school is called Hailsham. There they spend majority of their childhood till they are teenagers. While they are at Hailsham the clones are constantly monitored with tracking devices and are regularly checked upon by a doctor to make sure they are in perfect health. Once the three main characters are teenagers they are moved a community of cottages. Here they are offered a bit more freedom. This is where they await their fate. These clones are destined to become organ donors until they die. All three characters struggle with the idea of who they were cloned from and try to find a way to prolong their fate as much as possible. Sadly it does not work. Ruth C is the first one to pass then followed by Tommy D. The only one left in the end is Kathy H who is informed that it is her turn to donate.

Let me first start by saying that although I consider this film to be good it still took a toll on me. Let us just say I was not a very happy person when I finished watching it. If anything I felt furious! Yeah I know, it is just a movie and things like that are not likely to happen. Well we don’t know that for sure now do we? Anyways getting back to the film. Like I was saying I thought this film was pretty good and I felt like it conveyed quite a lot in terms of our human nature, pressure by society and technological advancements that we even face now.

A question that is presented in the film is that if we were able to have a cure for cancer and for any disease that existed would we choose to retract from that just to save a few clones? Most people would say that if it is for the better good than why change things. You know the saying kill a few and save more. Well essentially that is what happening in this film. Then the moral dilemma rises. Is it right to treat these clones who are humans and have feelings of their own as cattle? I personally would not be okay with this. Someone can then ask me what if it was a relative of mine that was dying and that harvesting a clone’s organs was the only way to save them. I would say no. There is a natural order to things and I believe that we should never trade one life for another. It just isn’t right.

Then there is the whole issue that these clones are humans and that they too have feelings of their own and want lives of their own. Towards the end Kathy and Tommy try to find a way to prolong their donations but fail. Their natural instincts and human nature was to find a way to be with each other as long as they were able to. We humans always try to find purpose in life or at least try to cling to something that makes us feel happy. These clones aren’t any different.


Think about it this way… would you be willing to kill essentially what is a human being to save another? 

Wednesday, October 8, 2014

Bookmarking Soul Mate? I think so

Doesn't it frustrate you when you can’t find anyone who is tagging articles that are useful to the topic you are currently researching? Well believe me I had a hell of a time finding someone who actually tagged more than one decent article on cloning. So after countless hours of searching….haha just kidding it didn’t take that many hours but it took a while, I finally found someone who tagged various articles dealing with cloning.

So without further ado… drumroll please….. I would like to introduce Rudy Garns!

I just happened to stumble upon him while I was on diigo.com.

A little bit about Rudy: he is a philosopher who is interested in the philosophy of mind, evolution and technology. Pretty cool huh? Well if you want to learn more about him you can view his profile on diigo.

Now to get to why I actually chose to follow this guy.

His library of tagged articles on cloning didn’t all have to do with the ethics behind cloning and whether it is right or wrong which was very refreshing. His tagged articles ranged from the ethics behind cloning to the technology behind it and its applications. His library even had an article dealing with cloning on a legal basis called “United Nations Will Reassess Ban on Human Cloning”. I will definitely be reading that article pretty soon.

Rudy’s library did not only focus on human cloning which was nice. He also included some articles on animal cloning. The article that caught my attention the most on animal cloning was “Man’s Best Friend Forever: Cloning dogs for love and profit.” Should be an interesting read.

Finally to the main reason why I chose to follow Rudy!

Although my research mainly has to do with human cloning, I could not resist to be captivated by two things in Rudy’s library.

The first one was an article called “Why we should resurrect Neanderthals.” Like who wouldn’t want to read that article. Just imagine Neanderthals just walking among us. Scary? Yeah I would think so. Interesting? Definitely! Imagine all the possibilities! Honestly, the first thing that popped into my head was that movie Encino Man, you know the one with Brendan Fraser in it were he is a caveman…. Just thought I should share that.

If you haven’t seen it, well here is a picture so you can get an idea of what I am talking about:

Anyways moving on…. The second gem in Rudy’s library is a collection of links titled… “Clones, Drones and Cyborgs.” How cool is that?! I don’t think I would of ever had stumbled upon this anywhere else or even thought of researching drones and cyborgs. The collection of articles under this group range from technology, a bit of Sci-fi, ethics to what makes us humans. This collection has 144 links so believe me there is plenty to read. If you are into cyborgs or learning about extending a human’s life span to about 500 years this is definitely the place to start.

And if you are researching about clones or just happen to be looking for an interesting read just visit Rudy’s library.

Believe me you’ll definitely find something that catches your eye.


Thursday, October 2, 2014

Playing God

When I was a little girl I was thought by my mom to pray every night and to believe in god. I was told he was the creator of all things including us humans. So I grew up…..and yes I still have the same beliefs. It is kind of hard to believe in anything else when it has been drilled into you. Not that I mind of course.

When you believe that god is the creator of all things it is crazy to think otherwise.

So what about human cloning? If it ever became possible to do would it not be considered an act against god? Wouldn't those people helping create clones be considered to be playing god?

It’s funny the first thing that pops up into my head when the phrase “playing god” comes up is the movie Jurassic Park III. There is a scene in the movie where one of the characters asks Dr. Grant (the main character in all of the Jurassic park movies except for the second one) if that was how dinosaurs were made (they were in a lab) and Dr. Grant replies that no it wasn't, that that was how you played god.


Have you ever noticed that most movies that have to do with cloning like Jurassic Park and Star Wars among other ones end very badly. People either get eaten or an entire government goes to shit. Don’t get me wrong these movies are usually pretty good but you would think we might pick something up from them. Like cloning most of the time doesn't lead to anything good. But hey why should we worry and give a shit?Apparently we are the superior race so it doesn't matter what the hell we do.

How are we to know what the future of cloning will bring? Are the clones, if ever created, going to be like an ordinary person or are they going to serve a single purpose? You know like in Superman where the people of Krypton were designed to serve a specific purpose and they would never be able to do anything else. I am not saying this is going to be the case but if it is then we might as well be taking free will and throwing to the fucken trash.

Honestly, if you think about it, if cloning ever became possible and those clones were developed to serve a specific purpose wouldn't we become expendable? That would really suck. What the hell are we supposed to do then? Just waddle around till we go extinct? Yeah I know that sounds really dramatic but hey you never know what can happen. Not too long ago we didn't even know what the hell a computer was and now we can’t even live without them.


I know cloning and genetics can bring a lot of useful things to the table but there is always going to be that one person who will try to twist their research and pretend they are doing something good but rather they are doing it for their own benefit which most of the times ends terribly. Almost like Frankenstein and his monster.




Are we really ready to bring all of this upon us? Are we willing to give cloning a chance knowing that there isn't certainty in it?