Mameli, M. Reproductive cloning, genetic engineering and the autonomy of the child:
the moral agent and the open future. Journal of Medical
Ethics, 2007.
In this article, Mameli
takes two authors who are one sided on the issue of morality of reproducing
through genetic engineering and bio technologies in order to disprove them on
the matter that genetically engineered people would be different from people
who are traditionally conceived. The arguments from both authors cited are that
people conceived through cloning and genetic engineering means would be unable
to assume responsibility for their actions because the responsibility would
fall on the parents who engineered their children that way.
The author cleverly
uses the theory of nature vs nurture to make the point that genetically
engineered people would be driven to adapt to their surroundings rather than
follow their genetic instincts. Mameli’s
arguments are straight to the point and are easy to follow so that the points
made and perspective presented come through clearly. Mameli’s arguments are
also very relatable to other studies concerning people’s basic instincts.
This article is very
relatable to any paper trying to bring into perspective the moral standings of
those for and against cloned and genetically engineered humans.
No comments:
Post a Comment